Search:

You know you can’t work forever – and you certainly aren’t immortal. But plenty of business owners are living as though they’re completely infallible.

Greg Thompson

| 18 min read | 26 Apr 2024

The External Reporting Board (XRB) has released updated reporting thresholds for public benefit entities (PBEs): Tier Old criteria New criteria Tier 1* Total expenses greater than $30m Total expenses greater than $33m Tier 2 Total expenses less than $30m Total expenses less than $33m Tier 3 Total expenses less than $2m Total expenses less than $5m Tier 4 Total operating payments $140,000 No change *Note; an entity is also required to apply Tier 1 if it has “public accountability”. This decision is welcome as many PBE entities will see a reduction in reporting requirements and compliance costs. These thresholds have not been updated since 2012; in that time, various new pieces of legislation have been introduced and inflation has pushed many entities from Tier 3 to Tier 2 reporting without becoming any larger or more complex. Several new PBE standards have also been issued over the last decade, causing concerns that the costs of reporting exceeded the benefit to users under the previous size thresholds. Research by the XRB on the expenditure of PBE entities shows there is substantially less clustering around the $5 million threshold, compared to the $2 million threshold. In total there are 33 entities with total expenditure between $4.8 million and $5.2 million, while there are 115 entities with total expenditure between $2.8 million and $3.2 million. When does this change apply? The new thresholds are mandatory for periods beginning after 28 March 2024, which impacts 31 March 2025 balance dates onward. However, the change can be applied for periods that end after the standard takes effect (28 March), so those preparing reports for 31 March 2024 balance dates onward are also eligible. This news is timely for Incorporated Societies applying XRB PBE reporting standards for the first time under the Incorporated Societies Act 2022, as more Incorporated Societies will also now have lower reporting requirements. Determining your expenditure Total expenses for the purpose of determining a reporting threshold include all of an entity’s operating expenditure. This includes grants or donations made by an entity, but does not include capital expenditure (assets) or loan payments. How does it work in practice? If you now find yourself eligible to apply a lower reporting tier due to this change, it can be implemented immediately. However, you need to consider future expenditure as you may end up transitioning back quickly if this grows year on year. It’s also important to think about consolidation requirements if your entity sits within a group, so that a change in reporting tier at the entity level doesn’t interfere with group reporting. PBEs can apply requirements of a higher tier if they want to, so if you are happy to stay at the current reporting tier – that’s fine. For example, we have seen this with recently established PBEs that knew they would exceed the previous $2m expenditure threshold in future years, so they start by adopting Tier 2 rather than waiting until they hit the threshold. If your PBE previously applied Tier 1 requirements and you are transitioning to Tier 2 requirements due to your expenditure, the recognition and measurement accounting policies will remain the same, but there will be less disclosure requirements in the notes to the financial statements. Tier 2 and Tier 3 reporting requirements have some differences, mainly around presentation of revenue and expenses, and accounting for property, plant and equipment, investment property and publicly traded financial investments. Entities that previously applied Tier 2 requirements and are transitioning to Tier 3 can choose to either provide comparative data in accordance with Tier 2 requirements (i.e., leave it as it was) or restate them in line with Tier 3. If your entity is thinking about transitioning reporting tiers, start engaging in the process early so you can navigate this transition which can be deceptively complex at times.

Barry Baker

| 15 min read | 21 Mar 2024

There’s been a period of relative calm in the world of accounting standards in recent years, however they quietly continue to evolve and reflect the dynamic nature of business, and the need for transparency and accuracy in financial reporting. Recently, several important changes have been made to New Zealand equivalents to International Accounting Standards (NZ IAS) to make financial statements clearer, comparable and relevant. Key updates have been made to: 1. material accounting policies for year ends from 31 December 2023 onward 2. accounting for estimates for year ends from 31 December 2023 onward 3. the presentation of current and non-current liabilities for year ends from 31 December 2024 onward Understanding the implications and significance for your business Changes to NZ IAS 1: Disclosure of material accounting policies A shift from the significant to the material The amendment to NZ IAS 1 emphasises the disclosure of material accounting policies. It requires entities to make material accounting policies prominent and easily accessible within financial statements. Previously, businesses were only required to disclose their significant accounting policies. The move to releasing material accounting polices was made to reflect the fact that term and its application is described in detail in accounting standards, where the term significant is not. How will this benefit my organisation and its stakeholders? Transparent disclosure of accounting policies is crucial for stakeholders to comprehend how financial information is prepared and to assess the reliability of financial statements. By explicitly stating material accounting policies, companies provide clarity on significant judgments and assumptions applied in financial reporting, enhancing the overall transparency, trustworthiness and comparability of financial statements for different entities. Investors and other stakeholders can make more informed decisions when they have a clearer understanding of the underlying principles and methodologies used in financial reporting. It encourages companies to critically evaluate their accounting policies, ensuring they accurately reflect the economic substance of transactions and events. Businesses are encouraged to review the significant accounting polices previously disclosed to determine how they stack up against the new guidance to disclose material accounting policies. Changes to NZ IAS 8: Accounting for Estimates More consistency and reliability on the horizon The revision to NZ IAS 8 addresses the accounting for estimates, emphasising the need for consistency and reliability when estimating uncertain future outcomes. Over time, a change in accounting estimates has become confused with a change in accounting policy. The amendment replaces the definition for a change in accounting estimate with the definition for an accounting estimate as monetary amounts that are subject to measurement uncertainty. Enhance the usefulness of your financial statements … Estimates play a crucial role in financial reporting, particularly in areas such as fair value measurements, provisions, and impairment assessments. Ensuring the reliability and consistency of estimates turns your financial statements into a tool stakeholders can use to assess the potential impact of uncertainties on an entity's financial position and performance. … And mitigate risk The revised standard prompts companies to exercise greater diligence and transparency when making and disclosing estimates. By providing insight into significant judgments and uncertainties, you can mitigate the risk of misinterpretation and enhance stakeholder confidence in the reliability of your financial information. Additionally, it encourages robust internal controls and processes for estimating, monitoring, and disclosing uncertainties, all of which improves risk management practices. Changes to NZ IAS 1: Presentation of Current and Non-current Liabilities What is changing? The amendment to NZ IAS 1 focuses on the presentation of current and non-current liabilities, requiring a liability to be classified as current if, among others, the company does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least twelve months after the reporting period. The amendments to NZ IAS 1 clarify that the right to defer settlement must have substance, and it also discusses the impact of covenants on this assessment. Why is this important? Clearly presenting your current and non-current liabilities makes your liquidity and solvency position easier to understand. By segregating liabilities based on their maturity, financial statements provide valuable insights into an entity's short-term obligations and its ability to meet them, which helps stakeholders assess liquidity risk and financial health. The amendments state that at the reporting date, instead of considering covenants that will need to be complied with in the future, when considering the classification of the debt as current or non-current, the entity should disclose information about these covenants in the notes to the financial statements. The standard setter introduced these so investors can understand the risk that such debt could become repayable early and therefore improving the information being provided on the long-term debt. What is the impact on my business? The revised standard prompts entities to reassess their classification of liabilities, ensuring compliance with the new presentation requirements. By clearly delineating between current and non-current liabilities, businesses enhance the clarity and relevance of financial statements, enabling stakeholders to make more informed assessments of an entity's financial position and performance. It underscores the importance of effective liquidity management and strategic planning to meet short-term obligations and sustain long-term growth. What’s next? After a period of relative calm, we are expecting to see a minimum of two new accounting standards over the coming year. The first, IFRS 18, will impact the representation and disclosures of primary financial statements. Key changes include: • new required subtotals included in the statement of profit or loss such as operating profit, profit before financing and income taxes, • disclosures around management-defined performance measures (MPMs), and • enhanced requirements for aggregation and disaggregation (i.e., grouping of information). It is important to note that IFRS 18 is subject to consultation before the standard is adopted in New Zealand. We are also anticipating a new standard outlining disclosure requirements for subsidiary, and potentially other entities, who do not have obligations to produce financial statements. When and how this standard might be applied in New Zealand will be subject to XRB consultation.

David Pacey

| 10 min read | 20 Mar 2024

Update for Cryptopia Claimants and Stakeholders 5 March 2024

Update for Cryptopia Claimants and Stakeholders 5 March 2024

Update for Cryptopia Claimants and Stakeholders 20 February 2024

Update for Cryptopia Claimants and Stakeholders 20 February 2024

This publication is designed to give preparers of IFRS financial statements a high-level awareness of recent changes to International Financial Reporting Standards. It covers both new Standards and Interpretations that have been issued and amendments made to existing ones.

David Pacey

| 8 min read | 07 Feb 2024

Update for Dasset Creditors and Users 21 December 2023

The world of cryptocurrency saw more controversy this year with NFT markets collapsing, Sam Bankman-Fried being found guilty of a range of charges that could land him in prison for over 115 years, and Binance - the world’s largest exchange - agreeing to one of the biggest settlements in US history after violating anti-money laws and sanctions violations, by allowing terrorist groups to trade on its platform. And so cryptocurrency’s renaissance begins … Despite all the negativity, most cryptocurrency markets are up year on year in terms of price appreciation. This could be for a variety of reasons - speculation, artificial unregulated markets, or the maturity of the cryptocurrency industry increasing the confidence in the underlying asset. One element fuelling the fire of cryptocurrency markets is institutions looking to create financial products that allow traditional investors to get a piece of the virtual currency pie. Some of these include cryptocurrency spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or even the ability to gain crypto exposure in KiwiSaver. A cryptocurrency spot ETF is a type of investment fund designed to directly track the price of digital currencies like Bitcoin for example. It is a regulated and stock exchange-traded product, which means it is subject to oversight by regulatory authorities. In the U.S. this is the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and would be the Financial Markets authority (FMA) if such a product was ever to launch on the NZX. Spot ETFs are typically structured to hold actual cryptocurrency, and investors buy and sell shares of the ETF which should mimic the spot prices of the cryptocurrency. Other opportunities already exist for New Zealand investors with the highest-performing KiwiSaver in terms of short-term (last 12 months) returns through Kouras’s Carbon Neutral Cryptocurrency Fund, with a one-year return of 66.52%. This fund invests in institutional investments that have direct bitcoin exposure. Allowing KiwiSaver investors to put up to 10% of their portfolio into this. It is definitely for those with a more aggressive growth strategy with the fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO) outlining the fund “is only appropriate for investors that have a very long investment horizon and who are willing and able to withstand significant volatility. The Fund is expected to deliver a 50% loss every 1-2 years.” While these developments demonstrate how the industry is maturing, this evolution contradicts the founding principle of cryptocurrency: decentralisation. Bitcoin and other digital currencies were never intended to become investment assets sold on a stock exchange, unlike these newer products which rely on centralised institutions controlling and holding large amounts of cryptocurrency. It’s time to start regulating the renaissance All of this points to a growing imperative for regulatory intervention. A hybrid strategy is being explored by The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) to impose regulations on products that inherently have a lack of regulatory oversight. It has proposed a regulatory approach for the opportunities and challenges of new forms of private money like crypto assets. Having experienced the challenges of a deregulated market during our work liquidating failed exchanges like Cryptopia and our views about stablecoins (a type of cryptocurrency), Grant Thornton New Zealand submitted an alternative approach in a submission to RBNZ. Our perspectives recognise the potential significance to private money that stablecoins could have in the current financial landscape. Having seen the wild west of cryptocurrency, we remain advocates of the potential benefits of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) to revolutionise the financial industry. To advance products based on this technology, there is a need for robust regulation and risk management to protect New Zealand's monetary sovereignty, and to maintain trust in the global monetary system. Given the global nature of cryptocurrency, we believe that a coordinated, international approach is necessary to effectively address these risks. On 30 June 2023, RBNZ published the outcome of its public consultation. The submissions reinforced RBNZ’s view that there are significant risks and opportunities with treating virtual assets as money. They have now decided against proposing a regulatory response at this point in time. Another reason outlined for taking a cautious approach lies in regulatory developments globally. There is likely to be real advantages to aligning crypto asset regulation throughout the world. As various overseas regimes are implemented, best practice for regulating crypto assets may become clearer. This was reflected in our submission which stated the limited adoption of these new forms of private money including cryptocurrency means it is too early to develop a robust and futureproof approach to capture all potential risks associated with a new form of private money. The UK is signalling they intend to regulate crypto activities in 2024 through formal legislation. Australia is currently running a consultation process for making crypto exchanges and digital asset platforms subject to its existing financial services laws; this will require platform operators to obtain an Australian Financial Services Licence. These developments mean the RBNZ may be forced to change tactics and follow global changes. In the meantime, we will have to see what 2024 brings in the world of cryptocurrency.

Tom Aspin

| 5 min read | 14 Dec 2023

Why would a business ever choose to invest more time and money in financial reporting? You might think it’s always better to just do the minimum and stick to the usual special purpose reporting that most Kiwi company’s produce. But when your company is serious about achieving a higher profile on an international stage, there could be some unexpected upsides to stepping up to more rigorous financial reporting. Instead of special purpose reporting, a company could benefit from adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Put simply, it’s an international accounting language that crosses borders so investors or shareholders who have a reasonable level of financial knowledge can compare listed companies across the globe. The standards are comprehensive, consistent, transparent and universal. Different jurisdictions have their own versions of IFRS and Aotearoa is no exception. We have NZ IFRS, a local version of IFRS which includes domestic requirements for our market while ensuring we comply with IFRS. The standards are updated regularly. NZ IFRS and which companies must comply Naturally, NZ IFRS is required for publicly listed companies, whether they’re based here or internationally. For some businesses, especially household names, you’ll often see the complying information packaged up in the financial section of a glossy annual report. For other businesses, the information will be available on the Companies Office website. Privately owned New Zealand companies with assets totalling more than $66 million or revenue over $33 million must also comply with NZ IFRS. Other entities deemed ‘publicly accountable’ may also need to report under NZ IFRS, for example regulated entities such as banks or insurers. Adopting IFRS sends a clear message your company is ready for the big leagues If your company doesn’t meet the threshold for mandatory adoption of IFRS, why would you choose to opt into the standards? Attracting the right buyers at the right price The first and biggest motivator is the prospect of a sale. Reporting under IFRS makes a company more attractive in the international marketplace. If your company has the potential to be purchased by a global corporation as a subsidiary, that potential buyer will be an IFRS reporter. By stepping up to IFRS, your company can be assessed more easily and accurately by the prospective purchaser. We’ve seen many Kiwi companies sold overseas in recent years, from huge sales like Vend ($455 million) and Timely (around $100 million), through to high-performing SMEs and farms. IFRS shows you’re speaking the same language, and that your company can easily slot into their own reporting regime. It also demonstrates that your business has the capability and capacity to comply with IFRS. Because this level of reporting is more complex, and requires a higher level of sophistication, it shows a purchaser that your company has the acumen and expertise to be a major asset on the balance sheet. Stepping up your capital raising game Another important motivator of switching to NZ IFRS early is fundraising. If your business is seeking to raise money from the capital markets, adopting higher-level reporting can help investors make a more informed decision. It can give them confidence in your company and allows them to have a more in-depth understanding of precisely how the company is performing. And, if your company is dealing in complex financial instruments such as hedging, foreign exchange or derivatives, there is no information in special purpose reporting that tells you how to treat these. NZ IFRS provides clear guidance about reporting on these types of activities. IFRS produces higher-quality financial statements Financial statements produced under NZ IFRS are considerably more accurate than those produced under the special purpose financial reporting framework. A higher level of scrutiny is applied across your organisation’s financials, and the standards themselves provide guidance about how to improve the accuracy of your statements. Here’s some examples to highlight how they differ: If your company has $1m debtors owing at the end of the financial year, special purpose reporting will value that at $1m. That’s a straightforward way to account for those monies owed. In contrast, NZ IFRS demands a closer look at the outstanding invoices. If the company historically sees a 5% rate of default, your NZ IFRS financial statements will provision for that and value the accounts receivable at $950k. This is a more accurate valuation of the receivable invoices. When a business exports goods, once the goods are on a ship and on their way overseas, they are invoiced and recorded as a sale. Under NZ IFRS, those goods might not actually be sold until they land at the receiving port – the sale would be reversed back into inventory until the product arrives and ownership passes. Unlike special purpose reporting, NZ IFRS requires right-of-use values for leased assets, which needs some detailed calculations to capture. There are hundreds more rules like these that contribute to IFRS providing much more detailed and accurate accounts. If you adopt IFRS, the quality of your accounts is going to be significantly higher, and it could change your final numbers quite substantially. Making a decision about whether to adopt NZ IFRS Adopting NZ IFRS does involve extra work and higher costs. You certainly wouldn’t adopt these standards lightly. Ideally, you should consider the costs and benefits to the business – is it worthwhile? If IFRS statements could make the difference between a sale or no sale, or maximise the value of your company, it could be an investment with a very impressive return. It won’t be right for every business, but for up-and-coming companies with great acquisition prospects, NZ IFRS can show you’re ready for the big stage.

Kylie Meyer

| 5 min read | 11 Dec 2023

Update for Cryptopia Claimants and Stakeholders 2 November 2023

Update for Cryptopia Claimants and Stakeholders 2 November 2023

Update for Dasset Creditors and Users 19 October 2023

Beyond compliance: What are your annual financials really telling you? With the first six months of the 2024 year behind us and March 2023 year end compliance work in full swing, it’s always interesting to see common themes jumping out from clients’ financial reports. While annual compliance can be seen as a chore for many, it still provides important opportunities to discover valuable insights to keep your business safe and help it improve. What’s behind your record revenue numbers? To a large degree this is an inflation story, but we are seeing genuine growth in the mix as well. The key is maintaining and increasing the gains you’ve made. Revisit your goals for what you want your 2024 year-end financials to look like and develop or enhance your plan to get there. For example, what can you do to generate more leads and increase customer retention? From setting up a customer feedback programme to exploring where advertising your brand would be most effective, a little bit more investment in your sales and marketing efforts can make a huge difference. And, how well do you know your client base, and what are your most successful and profitable product lines? While you’re likely to have a reasonably accurate idea of where your revenue is coming from, investing in tools and software to segment your customer base can open up a whole new world of up-to-the-minute insights about what’s working well and what isn’t. You can then allocate more resource to the most successful products and services. Take the 80/20 rule for example – if 80% of your revenue comes from 20% of your customers or offerings – focus on that instead of everything else. This can also give you time and space to explore new products or services to enhance your customers’ experience. The margin squeeze: Reduced gross profit percentage A weaker New Zealand dollar, higher costs of freight and shipping in the earlier part of the 2023 financial year, and higher costs to purchase goods all contribute the squeeze. While businesses have put their prices up, contributing to the growth in revenue, in many cases it has not been by enough, or not soon enough to maintain gross profit margins to the same extent as in 2022. We typically see a lag in clients putting their prices up, often wearing cost escalation for fear of losing business and market share. Keep a regular eye on your month to month and year to date financial results, along with comparison to prior years. Once or twice a year just isn’t going to cut it in a volatile economic environment. This is where the power of periodic reporting comes in. These monthly reports act as a temperature check for your business by giving you updates about your key performance indicators which typically include: • Current ratio of liabilities to assets (working capital) • Gross and net profit margins • Interest cover • Stock turnover • Aged debtors and creditor payment times • Ratio of wages to sales It may sound onerous to set up, but it’s an invaluable exercise. Once you have reports automatically rolling over monthly, you can also streamline your annual compliance requirements, save a considerable amount of time trying to find historical information, and get regular up-to-date results that lead to improved decision-making. Overheads are creeping up What seems like death by a thousand cuts, with overheads up across the board, a little here and a little there, it absolutely makes a difference, particularly at the wages line. We’ve heard this in the media on a frequent basis and it has absolutely been playing out in clients’ results. Watch out for ‘lazy’ costs. It’s easy for excess to creep in when times are good and the cash is flowing. Consider what is necessary to core business and staff morale and retention, and focus on trimming the fat. Are you up to speed on technology developments within your industry, and continued emergence of AI? Are there tools or processes you could introduce to materially reduce overheads or improve efficiencies? This could include reducing the impact of travel on your overhead costs by using technology for meetings instead, or simply delaying capital expenditure for a certain period of time. Sometimes bigger cuts need to be made – particularly when it comes to wages, but proceed with caution and approach all decisions with a future focus. For example, if you need to reduce your headcount, will this increase again during your next growth phase? There’s always going to be costs for recruiting and training new team members, and if the labour market is tight how will this impact your ability to deliver products and services to customers? It all comes down to cashflow A cliché no doubt, but cashflow is absolutely the lifeblood of your business. There’s lots of levers you can pull to improve your position, including: Terms of trade with your customers: Can you reduce/re-negotiate payment terms, speeding up your cash conversion rate? Making customer payments easy: Set up a click through payment function within your invoices and enable payment by credit card. The easier it is to be paid, the sooner you will be paid. Focus on debtor collection: Stop putting off those tough conversations and start making your accounting software work for you – many products have automated reminders. Take the time to set this up and any other relevant functionality. It will save you time in the long run. Are you carrying too much stock? Does your stock system alert you to aged stock? And, without shooting yourself in the foot from a margin perspective, what clever ways can you clear excess stock profitably? Are you paying your creditors too soon? Make the most of payment terms available to you and consider re-negotiating with suppliers where applicable. Are you getting the best deal from your suppliers? Go to market and see what’s out there. We’ve seen some incredible cost savings for clients undertaking this activity. Consolidate your suppliers: If you’re using a multitude of suppliers, explore options where you can negotiate a better rate by spending more with fewer suppliers, resulting in cost savings overall Consider debt funding structures: You may be able convert short term bank overdrafts into term debt to spread the load during times of tight cashflow. Jump on the tax pooling bandwagon: Consider using tax pooling to smooth out or defer provisional tax payments. And above all, forecast, forecast, forecast! Failing to forecast cashflow and plan ahead can cause even the most profitable businesses to rapidly fail.

Joel Gauntlett

| 5 min read | 24 Oct 2023

Good policies are essential for every business - how effective are yours? Almost everything happening within your business - from decision making and employee behaviour, to ensuring consistency and compliance throughout your organisation – should be guided by clear and effective policies.

Ashdin Dubash

| 4 min read | 04 Oct 2023

Update for Dasset Creditors and Users 15 August 2023

Update for Dasset Creditors and Users 28 August 2023

The more you know about your business, the better your decision-making can be. That’s why we’re always surprised at how many businesses don’t produce consistent monthly reports. Periodic reporting checks the pulse of your business and gives you monthly updates on your key performance indicators.

Jay Desai

| 5 min read | 24 Aug 2023

In March 2024, PCI DSS version 3.2.1 is officially retires and version 4.0 comes into full effect – and if your business accepts card payments, you need to ensure you’re ready. PCI DSS protects your customers’ information when they provide their credit/debit card details or planned payments, and you must comply with the standard.